Pediatrics & Neonatology
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 183-189 , August 2011

Gender Differences of Final Height Contributed by Parents’ Height Among Healthy Individuals

  • Pen-Hua Su

      Affiliations

    • Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
    • Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Shu-Li Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
    • Division of Environmental Health and Occupational Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jia-Yuh Chen

      Affiliations

    • Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
    • Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, No. 110, Section 1, Chien-Kuo North Road, Taichung City 402, Taiwan.

Received 25 September 2009 ,Revised 24 June 2010 ,Accepted 12 August 2010.

  • Image Result

    (A) The contribution of father’s height to the tallest son in family (Y=102.40+0.42X; adjusted R2=0.20; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (B) The contribution of father’s height to the shortest son

    (A) The contribution of father’s height to the tallest son in family (Y=102.40+0.42X; adjusted R2=0.20; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (B) The contribution of father’s height to the shortest son in family (Y=105.26+0.37X; adjusted R2=0.13; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (C) The contribution of mother’s height to the tallest son in family (Y=109.26+0.41X; adjusted R2=0.14; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (D) The contribution of mother’s height to the shortest son in family (Y=99.82+0.44X; adjusted R2=0.13; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (E) The contribution of father’s height to the tallest daughter in family (Y=109.58+0.31X; adjusted R2=0.13; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036). (F) The contribution of father’s height to the shortest daughter in family (Y=109.72+0.28X; adjusted R2=0.11; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036). (G) The contribution of mother’s height to the tallest daughter in family (Y=101.14+0.39X; adjusted R2=0.15; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036). (H) The contribution of mother’s height to the shortest daughter in family (Y=92.33+0.41X; adjusted R2=0.18; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036).

  • Image Result
    (A) The contribution of father’s height to the tallest son in family (Y=102.40+0.42X; adjusted R2=0.20; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (B) The contribution of father’s height to the shortest son

    (A) The contribution of father’s height to the tallest son in family (Y=102.40+0.42X; adjusted R2=0.20; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (B) The contribution of father’s height to the shortest son in family (Y=105.26+0.37X; adjusted R2=0.13; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (C) The contribution of mother’s height to the tallest son in family (Y=109.26+0.41X; adjusted R2=0.14; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (D) The contribution of mother’s height to the shortest son in family (Y=99.82+0.44X; adjusted R2=0.13; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113). (E) The contribution of father’s height to the tallest daughter in family (Y=109.58+0.31X; adjusted R2=0.13; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036). (F) The contribution of father’s height to the shortest daughter in family (Y=109.72+0.28X; adjusted R2=0.11; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036). (G) The contribution of mother’s height to the tallest daughter in family (Y=101.14+0.39X; adjusted R2=0.15; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036). (H) The contribution of mother’s height to the shortest daughter in family (Y=92.33+0.41X; adjusted R2=0.18; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036).

  • Image Result
    (A) The contribution of midparental height to the tallest son in family (Y=49.13+0.76X; adjusted R2=0.32; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113), comparing the FPH and CMH regression lines. (B) The contri

    (A) The contribution of midparental height to the tallest son in family (Y=49.13+0.76X; adjusted R2=0.32; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113), comparing the FPH and CMH regression lines. (B) The contribution of midparental height to the shortest son in family (Y=48.32+0.74X; adjusted R2=0.24; p value for slope<0.01; n=1113), comparing the FPH and CMH regression lines. (C) The contribution of midparental height to the tallest daughter in family (Y=60.43+0.62X; adjusted R2=0.25; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036), comparing the FPH and CMH regression lines. (D) The contribution of midparental height to the shortest daughter in family (Y=57.69+0.61X; adjusted R2=0.26; p value for slope<0.01; n=1036), comparing the FPH and CMH regression lines. CMH=corrected midparental height; FPH=final height for parental height.

PII: S1875-9572(11)00064-7

doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.05.003

Pediatrics & Neonatology
Volume 52, Issue 4 , Pages 183-189 , August 2011